Generative AI, or GenAI, is quickly becoming an integral part of the financial ecosystem, whether financial institutions (FIs) are using it directly or through their vendors. From streamlining daily tasks to analyzing and producing content, GenAI is a significant time and resource saver, as well as an innovative tool for improving products, services, and customer experiences.
However, these benefits don’t come without risks. From AI washing to advanced cybersecurity threats, financial institutions must tread carefully. Whether your FI is already exploring GenAI or just starting to consider its use, understanding the whole landscape — both the opportunities and the risks — is essential to ensuring your risk management program stands strong.
Table of Contents
Related: Q&A: The Future of Artificial Intelligence and Contract Management
GenAI is one of the most used subsets of AI in the financial services space. Unlike traditional AI, which provides answers or outcomes based on structured data, GenAI produces outputs that resemble the data used to train it. For example, a bank or mortgage lender might create a GenAI-based customer service chatbot and train it to answer more complex questions using existing FAQs, customer data, and other internal sources.
Even if your institution hasn’t deployed GenAI (or any AI) internally, your vendors may be using it. According to The Ncontracts 2025 Third-Party Risk Management Survey, most FIs monitor their vendors’ AI usage by collecting documentation and adding usage language to contracts, both of which are strong controls to mitigate AI-related risks.
Related: Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Risk Management Controls: How to Protect Your Financial Institution
AI has been a hot topic in the financial services sector for years. Following a 2025 AI-focused Executive Order and a Securities and Exchange Commission-hosted roundtable, there’s a continued emphasis on the responsible use of technology.
For financial institutions with lean teams managing dozens — or even hundreds of vendors — GenAI tools can significantly boost efficiency by automating tasks, such as document processing, report drafting, or contract reviews. For example, Ntelligent Contract Assistant helps reduce manual workloads, flag potential risks sooner, and enable faster, more informed contract decisions. Savings like these could result in $200 billion and $240 billion in annual value for the global banking sector, according to The McKinsey Global Institute.
GenAI can also strengthen risk management by supporting dynamic risk assessments, predictive analytics, and scenario modeling. On the compliance side, it helps turn regulatory changes into actionable insights, keep policies aligned with the latest guidance, and prepare exam-ready documentation.
GenAI can also be a game-changer in research, analysis, and product development. Financial institutions can use GenAI to design new products, tailor services to specific customer needs, and develop solutions for complex financial challenges. Its ability to process massive volumes of data, news, and market information enables deeper investment research and analysis. By uncovering insights and identifying opportunities that traditional methods may miss, GenAI helps FIs make faster, more informed decisions.
Watch on Demand: Managing Third-Party AI Risk: What You Need to Know Today
While GenAI can save financial institutions time, money, and resources, it comes with significant risks.
Related: How to Manage Third-Party AI Risk: 10 Tips for Financial Institutions
Mitigating GenAI risks starts with strengthening your FI’s risk management framework. But how do you know where to start?
The Fintech Open Source Foundation’s (FINOS) AI Readiness Governance Framework is an open-source toolkit that helps FIs adopt and manage generative AI. Ideal for technical and risk teams, the guidance covers AI use across development, procurement, and operations, giving FIs a well-rounded resource for practical and responsible AI implementation.
Enforcement actions are also helpful resources for identifying gaps in your risk management program. For example, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) charged two investment advisers with “making false and misleading statements about their use of artificial intelligence.” The enforcement action — and $400,000 in combined civil penalties — sent a clear message to financial companies: Ensure your AI claims are accurate, transparent, and well-documented.
As your institution evolves its use of GenAI, take a proactive approach to managing risks throughout the risk lifecycle:
Related: What is the Risk Management Process?
Related: AI Is Already Costing Financial Institutions Millions: Here's How to Manage the Risks
As you evaluate your FI’s GenAI usage internally and via vendors, consider these best practices to build a solid risk management framework now and in the future:
Related: What is AI Auditing and Why Does It Matter?
Want more insights into managing third-party AI risk?